Up wi the bonnets

You can argue that your player was trying to play the ball ect. What is inexcusable is your players were heard celebrating a leg break and laughing about the boy having to get two weeks off work. You can deny that all you want so that you don't look as bad on this public forum but it happened.

Good game the day and could of gone either way. Strollers were a decent bunch of lads too.

We played really well first 10 mins and scored but after our goal it was one way traffic and couldn't really have grumbled if we got beat. Still feels crap to go most of the game winning and then draw but It would have been day light robbery if we had won.

i know the Fife Thistle v St Monans game on but is it in danger now with this snow? pretty heavy where I am outside St Sndrews.

u beat us once and thats our domination finished is it m8.lol gee yirsel a shake.unlucky ti ur lads who wrkd hard in beating us.they played well.jst a pity ther cheating committee let thm aw doun.CHEATERS NEVER WIN I dont play with Pittenweem. I may be wrong but im led to believe you got beat at the weekend there. So yeah, two games on the bounce, id say your domination is finished. Cheating i would define as breaking rules to gain an unfair advantage. I dont think this really applies here. Cheating if he was a player coming from a higher level in hope no one would recognise him then aye fair enough, but Cheating because there was a screw up with paper work? hmmmm call it what you want but i dont think there was any intention to gain unfair advantage by playing an amatuer player.

I think what scotty boy said earlier is bang on. Pittenweem are not in the semi final because of a piece of paper. The player in question is an amatuer player who has played the majority of the season ironically with Pittenweem as an eligble player. Not as if he is a ringer from a junior team who thought noone would recognise them. Justice has not been done with Kennoway going through, complete the contrary in my eyes. End of the day its amatuer football, and football hasnt won here, instead a stupid piece of paper has. Only justice that will be done is if Kennoway dont win it. Before anyone says anything, i just want to reiterate that all though this is my view, im well aware that paper work and rules need to be in place to have a structure within the association. However still a bit poor for the boys who worked hard to bring an end to Kennoways domination.

Kennoway are being made out to be in the wrong here, if they win the protest then they deserve to progress end of At end of day kennoway will prob win protest, Pittenweem have been very nieve in not properly checking the boy was released, and it's now very easy to blame st monans. But I think they have look at themselves for their mistake. as previously stated, rules are rules and the buck does stop at pittenweem. I do not blame kennoway for exercising their right to query and protest. I also agree that St monans are not to blame in the grand scale fo things. In saying that St monans knowing this before the game and having a player at the game so they could tell kennoway is pre medidtated bitterness. I personally think its pathetic. I also cant believe that Pittenweem didnt make sure this was avoided by making sure everything was in place for Daz to play. At the end of the day an team made up of amatuer players from Pittenweem beat Kennoway and that is something for them to take away from this. Ive also said that it is a compliment to Kennoway how happy the players were to have beat Kennoway at the final whistle.

Great result 4 pittenweem 4 very good goals from pittenweem, one of which a cracker of a freekick that wouldnt look out of place on MOTD. Great result and thought Kennoway would put their hands up and be gracious in defeat. the majority were but some just clearly cant handle being beat. great win for weem pity ur gaffer has taken a chance on daz being able to play in time hopefully he aint fu@kd it for u's. Not his fault he can play him if he's be told that darren was released which he was. some result for pittenweem think that is prob kennoways first defeat at home for over 2 years.... try 5 years mate totally agree with Stmoan, some kennoway players should take it as a compliment that pittenweem were so happy to have beat Kennoway. Shame if the semi has been taken away from them, considereing the player in question has played most of the season for pittenweem. So, was the boy not allowed to play Kennoway or has he not been signed correctly the whole season? He was a pittenweem player and then decided to go to St monans in january but after a few weeks decided he couldn't settle in the area (haha) and went back to pittenweem recently. Aparrantly verbally pittenweem been told by officials that he was good to play against kennoway. However people changing stories now. Also St monans knew they had kept his release form and in anticipation of a pittenweem victory at kennoway they had a suspended player watching so they could tell kennoway about the player being Very bitter from St monans, rules are rules but kennoway know that they are not in the semis through merit. They probably don't care either.

Great result 4 pittenweem 4 very good goals from pittenweem, one of which a cracker of a freekick that wouldnt look out of place on MOTD. Great result and thought Kennoway would put their hands up and be gracious in defeat. the majority were but some just clearly cant handle being beat. great win for weem pity ur gaffer has taken a chance on daz being able to play in time hopefully he aint fu@kd it for u's. Not his fault he can play him if he's be told that darren was released which he was. some result for pittenweem think that is prob kennoways first defeat at home for over 2 years.... try 5 years mate totally agree with Stmoan, some kennoway players should take it as a compliment that pittenweem were so happy to have beat Kennoway. Shame if the semi has been taken away from them, considereing the player in question has played most of the season for pittenweem.

Be very surprised of the paperwork isnt right for this boy. Still beat the so called best team in the league convincingly and that cant be taken away from them even if the semi final is

Great result 4 pittenweem 4 very good goals from pittenweem, one of which a cracker of a freekick that wouldnt look out of place on MOTD. Great result and thought Kennoway would put their hands up and be gracious in defeat. the majority were but some just clearly cant handle being beat.

Just want to say that some of the Lochore boys are idiots. Moaning at referee for everything even when our goal keeper needs to tie his laces. I belive they would sell their parents for a win. No sportsmanship what so ever and clearly go out on a sunday to take out their anger on football. The wee guy at the back needs to go to anger managment or a psychiatrist as he was maybe touched as a child. Also a few of them need to look in the mirror before they call anyone ugly. Morons!! quality post b.t.w....but sour grapes me thinks... Well who here likes getting beat? I guess you can say its sour grapes. Dont like getting beat by anyone but its easier when the opposition are a good bunch of guys and would quite happily have a pint after the game. This is the same team that we played in a cup that went to penaltys. The referee got it wrong and decided after 5 pens each that buffet had only scored 4. Noone could believe it as both teams had scored all their penaltys, even the Lochore boys were laughing yet it took about 15 minutes to convince them that "taking the win" was not really the right thing to do. Anything to win though eh!! eventually we did take penaltys and they won! lol

Just want to say that some of the Lochore boys are idiots. Moaning at referee for everything even when our goal keeper needs to tie his laces. I belive they would sell their parents for a win. No sportsmanship what so ever and clearly go out on a sunday to take out their anger on football. The wee guy at the back needs to go to anger managment or a psychiatrist as he was maybe touched as a child. Also a few of them need to look in the mirror before they call anyone ugly. Morons!!

The guy who shouted the haircut comment never mentioned "a proper" haircut, he just meant that Bowman needed a haircut as the description mutated mullets with ridiculas colours through their hair pretty much describes Bowmans hairstyle although he doesn't have many ridiculous colours running through it but it is very close to a mullet He has had that haircut for a long time. Dont think he fancied a skin head when Beckham shaved his. You must know what im talking about with that description though! i see it all the time and its worse than the 80's mullet.

Also the job im in the now i work in "deprived" areas, which there are some in fife. Your more likely to see people and there offspring sporting what can only be described as mutated mullets with ridiculas colours through their hair. is that a proper hair cut? I also realise the irony of my profile picture being one of the ugliest footballers ever.lol